On May 27, 2013, at 8:43 AM, John R Levine <[email protected]> wrote: >> Are you intending to inform all implementers and domain owners of this >> limitation with admonitions to search the list archives? > > I am expecting it to be in the RFC, yes. > > It's still a work in progress, and it's not intended to be implemented by > people who don't have a reasonably good technical understanding of email > systems and the issues of spam filtering.
Some people inevitably thinks that people have a high level of understanding of email systems and the issue of spam filtering. > > Some people will inevitably want every new anti-spam twiddle to be the FUSSP, > no matter how many times we say it's not. SPF wasn't, DKIM (and particularly > ADSP) wasn't, and DMARC isn't and won't be. This should not be a surprise. > _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
