It's worth noting that at least one of the big Mail Receivers' aggregate
report generators is remembering addresses specified in rua= for at
least days, possibly weeks. (I didn't actually record the time taken, I
merely noted that on one occasion almost a week after making a change it
still wasn't being honoured by all.)
- Roland
On 08/08/2013 04:22 PM, Umesh Ratnayake wrote:
Hi Guys!
I recently implemented DMARC on one of our clients and initially set its
RUA field to [email protected] ( Example.co.uk is the alias domain name
of our client). And week ago, I changed the RUA field to another Email
address (which doesn't have the example.co.uk domain. - dmarcian.com)
My problem is
1) why I am still getting the aggregate reports to the [email protected]
rather than to the newly added Email address?
2) We are not sending any emails for the example.co.uk any more, and we
still get the Aggregate reports (Microsoft,Gmail) to the
[email protected]
3). Is there any way we can stop receiving the aggregate reports for the
domain example.co.uk as we are not not using the domain anymore.
I tried the changing the DMARC record even taking off from the DNS
settings field, but we still receive those aggregate reports.
Thank you in Advance
Uratnay
On 05/08/2013 20:00, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Send dmarc-discuss mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of dmarc-discuss digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: multiple from (Dave Crocker)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 19:58:39 +0200
From: Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
To: Murray Kucherawy <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-discuss] multiple from
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 8/5/2013 6:36 PM, Murray Kucherawy wrote:
Now, if there's a problem with the standards or reality (e.g., shifting
priorities) has evolved sufficiently that they need updating, then there
exist public processes available to any comer for amending them. If
they're broken or obsolete, let's fix them. But if that isn't
happening, maybe the blame isn't rightly placed there after all.
The thread got more abstract than my jet-lag allowed me to track, but I
think the above paragraph reduces things to the essential, pragmatic
point.
For worthy dialectic disagreements, reality tends to impose a negotiated
settlement having balance. (The only hard part, here, is determining
worthiness, lest crazy extremes get assigned unwarranted worthiness...
but I digress beyond the current thread into other parts of the real
world.)
If someone thinks the spec should be changed, they raise the suggestion.
If something looking like a rough consensus of the community agrees,
then the spec is changed (and I'm counting validated errata entries as
changing the spec.) Otherwise the suggestion fails.
It's an established, mundane, pragmatic process, and doesn't need
philosophical debate.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well
terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
End of dmarc-discuss Digest, Vol 20, Issue 3
********************************************
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
--
Roland Turner | Director, Labs
TrustSphere Pte Ltd | 3 Phillip Street #13-03, Singapore 048693
Mobile: +65 96700022 | Skype: roland.turner
[email protected] | http://www.trustsphere.com/
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
