I don't follow your logic John. Why would the DMARC policy of one domain affect the health of the mailing list for subscribers from other domains? I would think the only issue would be for users on the domain with the published dmarc policy?
-- Mason On Dec 20, 2013, at 11:35 AM, "John R Levine" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> The correct policy is p=none. > >> Considering that mailing lists are only about 10% of legitimate email >> traffic and if your humans do not rely on mailing lists, then you will be >> fine with DMARC and humans. > > Unfortunately, Franck is just wrong here. If you subscribe to a mailing list > and publish a policy other than p=none, you will screw up the list for other > subscribers. > > I expect that out of self-defense lists will have to add patches to reject > mail from anyone with DMARC policies. > > Regards, > John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY > Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. > _______________________________________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms > (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
