Hi, I'm not sure who has.. I hope we can contribute in something valuable for the community, one could be our open-source project libdkim++ https://github.com/halonsecurity/libdkimpp , perhaps in a section for open-source projects in faqs.
Best Regards, Jonas Falck CEO & Co-Founder HALON SECURITY INC 100 Montgomery Street, Suite 1080 San Francisco, CA 94104, USA Phone: +1.415.835.3030 Cell: +1.650.445.9076 [email protected] www.halonsecurity.com On 06 Jan 2014, at 19:01, Roland Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > We do appear to be spinning our collective wheels on this. Before getting > into substance concerns (e.g. proposed text), what has to happen for FAQ text > to change. In particular: > • Who has update rights? > • What has to happen before he/she/they will amend the FAQ? (e.g. > consensus on this list, consensus amongst dmarc.org signatories, something > else?) > > - Roland > > > > On 12/27/2013 10:27 AM, Terry Zink wrote: >> Maybe an update to the DMARC FAQ's would be useful here about how to work >> around this? >> >> >> http://dmarc.org/faq.html#s_3 >> >> >> >> http://dmarc.org/faq.html#r_2 >> >> >> -- Terry >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: >> [email protected] [mailto:[email protected] >> ] On Behalf Of Al Iverson >> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 2:26 PM >> To: DMARC natterage >> Subject: Re: [dmarc-discuss] the endless list argument, was Opinions, Please? >> >> I found it trivial to modify my own mailing list software to simply rewrite >> the From header so that the sender and visible from are "the list" instead >> of "the person." That way the list domain's reputation and policy apply, not >> the poster's. I recognize that John abhors this as a solution, but I do want >> to remind folks that there are other options to make everything play >> together nicely, if desired. Time will tell with regard to what ends up >> getting most often adopted. >> >> Regards, >> Al Iverson >> >> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:32 PM, John R Levine >> <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>> I don't follow your logic John. Why would the DMARC policy of one >>>> domain affect the health of the mailing list for subscribers from other >>>> domains? >>>> >>> >>> One user, who we'll call Mason, is a subscriber to the list. Another >>> user, who we'll call Franck, subscribes from an address with p=reject. >>> >>> Franck sends a few messages to the list. The list adds a subject tag >>> or message footer which breaks the DMARC signature, and it remails the >>> message with the list's bounce address, so DMARC fails. Mason's mail >>> system checks DMARC on the incoming list mail, finds that Franck's >>> DMARC says to reject it, so it rejects it. After a couple of >>> rejections, the list's automatic bounce handling removes Mason from the >>> list. Oops. >>> >>> This isn't hypothetical -- back when ADSP was new, a couple of >>> overenthusiastic implementations of ADSP bounced people off the IETF's >>> mailing lists exactly this way. >>> >>> The obvious defense is for list software to check Franck's DMARC on >>> incoming mail and not to accept his mail if it says p=quarantine or >>> p=reject. I've already adjusted my lists to do that. It turned out >>> to be a one-line config fix in majordomo2. >>> >>> R's, >>> John >>> >>> PS: If anyone is going to suggest that list software needs to be >>> rewritten not to break DKIM signatures, please don't. We've had that >>> argument many times already, list software isn't broken, and it ain't going >>> to happen. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dmarc-discuss mailing list >>> >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss >>> >>> >>> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note >>> Well terms ( >>> http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html >>> ) >>> >> >> >> -- >> Al Iverson | Chicago, IL | (312) 725-0130 >> Twitter: @aliverson / >> www.spamresource.com >> _______________________________________________ >> dmarc-discuss mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss >> >> >> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well >> terms ( >> http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html >> ) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dmarc-discuss mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss >> >> >> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well >> terms ( >> http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html >> ) >> >> > > -- > Roland Turner | Director, Labs > TrustSphere Pte Ltd | 3 Phillip Street #13-03, Singapore 048693 > Mobile: +65 96700022 | Skype: roland.turner > > [email protected] | http://www.trustsphere.com/ > _______________________________________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms > (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
