On Friday, January 24, 2014 20:25:14 John Levine wrote: > >> Do you have some examples? I've never seen one. > >> > > - [email protected] > > - [email protected] > > - [email protected] > > - [email protected] > > Same question Steve asked. Are these DMARC-aware, or do they just > happen to be configured in a way that doesn't modify messages in ways > that break DKIM signatures? > > I subscribe to three of them and are pretty sure it's the latter.
There were changes made to postfix-users to stop breaking DKIM signatures. It's been awhile, so I don't recall what, so I think it's fair to say it was changes to be DKIM aware, which gets you DMARC aware. IIRC, the opendkim- users list used to break signatures as well. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
