On Feb 24, 2014, at 8:26 AM, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: >> It is worth noting that any large scale spoofing via a poorly-secured >> forwarder or independent sender would cause most receivers to cease >> exempting them from DMARC processing anyway. This difficulty is largely >> self-correcting. > > Quite right. DMARC is just advice from a domain owner to a recipient, > and the best advice to give is whatever will make the recipients happy. > > In particular, this does not include telling people to throw away > perfectly good mail just because it went via a path you don't control. > and neither party (sender or receiver) can fix.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
