>> If you blindly followed Linkedin's p=reject advice, you'd find >> yourself bounced off this list. > >show an sample on that
Franck posts to this list, his DMARC says p=reject, and his messages like everyone else's arrive with no DKIM or SPF that satisfies DMARC, because that's what mailing lists do. >if you forward dmarc protected mails you have to add the forwarding >mailserver ip into opendmarc ignorehost to prevent you from being >disconnected, its same with spf checking Well, yes, that's what I was saying. You need meta-policy information to avoid shooting yourself in the foot from following DMARC policies. >> Linkedin knows about if and chooses not to fix it. > >fix what ? Sigh. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
