On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:58 AM, J. Gomez <[email protected]> wrote:
> So, in other words, there is not such a thing as a POLICY of REJECT in > DMARC; and if there was ever one, you just cannot trust it nor follow it > (as a receiver). > That's just a little bit hyperbolic. By extension, there's no such thing as "-all" in SPF or "dkim=discardable" in ADSP. > At least we still have the reporting feature of DMARC, as something which > is actually useful (for the senders). > There are several examples of senders that find the policy action useful because some key receivers do act on it. The same goes at least for SPF or any advanced use of DKIM. Honoring a "p=reject" might require more than zero thought. Unfortunately, that scares some people more than it probably should. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
