On Mar 31, 2014, at 12:16 PM, Rolf E. Sonneveld <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 03/29/2014 06:24 PM, John Levine wrote: >>> Is there a suggested way to abort the loop, other than preventing a DMARC >>> report email from being reported on, which has its own drawbacks? >> If you consider this to be a problem, you can send your reports from a >> subdomain >> with its own DMARC record that says not to report back. >> >> Or an entirely reasonable practical hack would be not to send reports >> on domains with traffic below some threshold. > > there may be various ways to work around this 'minor nuisance', but wouldn't > it be better to address this 'loose end' in the spec itself, instead of > having everyone to re-invent the weel? > > /rolf +1 _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
