>>> Or an entirely reasonable practical hack would be not to send reports >>> on domains with traffic below some threshold. >> >> there may be various ways to work around this 'minor nuisance', but wouldn't >> it be better to address this 'loose end' in >the spec itself, instead of having everyone to re-invent the weel?
I don't think so. There are a gazillion people using DMARC reports, and we've seen perhaps two who consider it to be a problem. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
