Forwarding alone shouldn't be blowing up messages. If you're doing something to the message content that invalidates the DKIM signature or causes the the from address and return path to not be aligned, that's where you're going to run into problems. If you don't modify the message in any way while forwarding it on, you shouldn't run into issues due to DMARC.
Regards, Al Iverson On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Paul Scott <[email protected]> wrote: > I run a number of web sites where users wish to have their e-mail address > with their own domain name. Some of these users (quite a few) do not read or > send mail through their web site or via their own domain server; rather they > wish their mail to be forwarded to a free mail account such as Yahoo! or > Gmail. > > Of course, the problems encountered with such a configuration have been > discussed on this list. And, I have independently arrived at a solution I now > see has been discussed: before forwarding incoming mail, munge the From: > header to match the forwarding server, and copy the sender’s e-mail address > to a Reply-To: header. Aside from being extremely ugly -- and problematic on > a perception level — it is also unworkable when the original sender’s e-mail > has been signed or encrypted. > > With signed or encrypted mail, the sender’s e-mail address no longer matches > their certificate so the validation fails. > > I don’t see any solution to this problem other than abandoning DMARC. > Unfortunately, a lot of organizations have adopted it, and the community > suffers as a result. Honestly, I don’t think DMARC was thought-out before it > was implemented. If I’m wrong, please set me straight and show me a solution. > > Thanks, > Paul > > > > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms > (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) -- Al Iverson | Chicago, IL | (312) 725-0130 Twitter: @aliverson / www.spamresource.com _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
