On 4/30/2014 6:22 PM, Douglas Otis wrote:
Skycoast.us is using a DMARC p=reject with users sending to a mailing list. Really?
I haven't seen any failures, yet.
I also see spf is checked for PRA and mailfrom and both DMARC and ADSP policies exchanged. The number of times spf macros run increases DDoS concerns related to macro expansion modulated by local-parts or subdomain labels. In the end, this still fails with most mailing-lists.
I haven't seen any failures, yet.
FWIW, it may not be a surprise these messages were not handled per DMARC, but instead placed in a spam folder. The collection of errant messages is growing based on ignored failures. Is that the expected mode of operation?
I don't understand this statement. Could you clarify? Paul -- Paul Scott [email protected] _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
