On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Peter Blair via dmarc-discuss <
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote:

>
> > I'd be curious about that "left off the domain" one; if an ISP were
> already
> > rejecting mail from domains that don't resolve, I doubt it would have
> been
> > delivered.
>
> +1 (again).
>
> It's a fairly prudent measure, rejecting mail with an invalid RHS with a
> 4XX series post-DATA reply.
>

Do you mean 5xx?  A syntactically invalid RHS doesn't seem to be something
that would be corrected by a retry later.

-MSK
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Reply via email to