On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 2:42 AM, John Levine via dmarc-discuss < [email protected]> wrote:
> >>You will not find me disagreeing with you, although I might use different > >>words than 'configuration issue'. However, I'm pretty sure we're not the > >>only folks in similar situations (consider, from an older thread, > >>netscape.com / aol.com addresses). ... > > >This is a tradeoff between senders and receivers. You're saying that > >for whatever reason, you're not prepared to generate mail that passes > >DMARC as currently defined, so you want receivers to do more work to > >work around that. > > I had a thing much like yours David, some of the people at the office used ISP SMTP servers for our company email, I spend the hour it took to reconfigure them to use Google Apps SMTP instead. I think I'll have to agree with Mr. Levine, to me it also looks mostly like a configuration issue -- Mvh/Best regards Henrik Schack ICQ: 889295 http://henrik.schack.dk/ http://links.schack.dk/
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
