On 6/16/15, 10:02 AM, "A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Oh, never thought about that. I know that scheme (separate A-R header) >since years. You're right. they may be combined to only one A-R. >But the way I use it they insert multiple A-R header. > >Would be good to hear from Murray if this is the intended use-case for >OpenDMARC. In general I know OpenDMARC simply as an A-R header parser. >So my assumptions could not be completely wrong... OpenDMARC handles any number of A-R fields with any combination of results reported. (Or, at least, it¹s written to do so.) In terms of signatures, prior to v2.10.0, OpenDKIM had to be configured to look at and report all signatures rather than just looking for the first one that passes. There are specific user lists for those packages though, if this is a software issue rather than an ecosystem issue (this list is meant for the latter, I believe). -MSK _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
