On 6/16/15, 11:39 AM, "A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss" <[email protected]> wrote:
>It's a little bit confusing. I have two unrelated issues. >The one mentioned above looks like a bug in OpenDMARC. >But that's unconfirmed by Murray... If you have evidence of a bug, please put it in a ticket on SourceForge. I don¹t check this list as often as I used to. > >> You actually have both multiple results in a single >> Authentication-Results header and multiple Authentication-Results >>headers. > >also yes. >I have multiple milter (smf-spf, OpenDKIM & OpenDMARC). Each insert it's >own A-R header and the one added by OpenDKIM contain validation results >for two valid DKIM signatures. Right. The RFCs say that¹s how A-Rs should be generated (add new ones rather than augmenting existing ones) when you have more results to report. -MSK _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
