Hi Jacob, thank you for your right consideration about the increase of the deployment and implementation of DMARC reporting, because I think for me it will be useful for a better assessment in future.
In this particular moment though, DMARC reporting for my domain is more o less the same of always. Best Regards. *Denis Salicetti* <http://linkedin.salicetti.it/> Avviso di riservatezza <http://goo.gl/zS2xL> | Inviami messaggi protetti <http://goo.gl/LbhIoi> 15251a1f17561224 2016-01-18 16:46 GMT+01:00 Jacob Evans <[email protected]>: Another thing to consider is the increase of the deployment and > implementation of dmarc reporting, as more SMTP Servers report spf/dkim > failures, those numbers will also increase in the report aggregation. > > My $.02 > ~Jake > > Thank You, > > Jacob D. Evans > Cloud Consultant > 717.417.8324 > <http://twitter.jacobdevans.com> <http://facebook.jacobdevans.com> > <http://www.jacobdevans.com> <http://linkedin.jacobdevans.com> > <[email protected]> > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Denis Salicetti via dmarc-discuss" <[email protected]> > *To: *"Matt Simerson" <[email protected]> > *Cc: *"Denis Salicetti via dmarc-discuss" <[email protected]> > *Sent: *Monday, January 18, 2016 10:36:58 AM > *Subject: *Re: [dmarc-discuss] I need an advice > > Hi Matt, > thank you very much for your kind reply. > > Best Regards. > > *Denis Salicetti* <http://linkedin.salicetti.it/> > > Avviso di riservatezza <http://goo.gl/zS2xL> | Inviami messaggi protetti > <http://goo.gl/LbhIoi> > > 2016-01-17 23:42 GMT+01:00 Matt Simerson <[email protected]>: > >> This sounds quite "normal" in my experience. >> >> I started using DMARC for exactly this reason, when one of my domains >> experienced increased spoofing attacks. In the years since, I've witnessed >> this scenario play out in a dozen other domains I manage for my clients. In >> every case, deploying DMARC for their domain with p=reject greatly reduces >> the volume of bounces they receive and the reports reveal the vast majority >> of attacks originating in China and smattering of other IPs from around the >> world. Within weeks after deploying DMARC, the attacks on that domain tail >> off and all but one case I've seen, don't recur. >> >> Matt >> >> PS: My same size is too small to draw conclusions but it seems that >> shorter domain names are more likely to be abused. >> >> On Jan 17, 2016, at 2:08 PM, Denis Salicetti via dmarc-discuss < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Guys, >> I have implemented DMARC for long with p=none rule with a minimal and >> sporadical Threat/Unknown sources, but recently I had to increase to >> p=quarantene and then to p=reject because I'm having a lot >> of Threat/Unknown sources (25% rate). >> It seems that lately my domain is under serious attack. I'm pretty sure I >> have zero impact of my legit email flow because each configuration is good, >> therefore every Threat/Unknown source is not legit (most of all from China). >> >> Someone more experienced of me can tell me if this rate is usual? Is >> there something more that I can do to minimize it? >> >> Thank you very much. >> >> *Denis Salicetti* <http://linkedin.salicetti.it/> >> >> Avviso di riservatezza <http://goo.gl/zS2xL> | Inviami messaggi protetti >> <http://goo.gl/LbhIoi> >> _______________________________________________ >> dmarc-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss >> >> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well >> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well > terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) >
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
