This is a fairly good list of potential DMARC senders: https://dmarcian.com/dmarc-status/
Cheers, ~ *MATT VERNHOUT* Founder, Editor EmailKarma.net <http://ekma.co/16G2Htm> It's not the size of your list, it's how you use it! My profiles: <http://ekma.co/1GrpgS5> <http://ekma.co/1bSPqy0> <http://ekma.co/16G2GFC> <http://ekma.co/16G2Htm> <http://ekma.co/1aqglmS> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Peter Bowen via dmarc-discuss < dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote: > Does anyone maintain a list of receivers known to send DMARC reports? I > enabled DMARC reporting for a domain we use for sending and have gotten > reports so far from 126.com, AOL, Belgacom, CapitalOne, Cisco, Comcast, > FastMail, Google, Infor, Microsoft, mail.ru, NetEase (163.com), QQ,and > Yahoo. > > From these reports, I’ve seen a number of different variations that do not > follow the XML Schema in RFC 7489. I know there is the DMARC WG at IETF, > but I haven’t seen any updates on the core spec, so I’m hoping someone > implementing DMARC may have sorted out what is considered acceptable. > > Thanks, > Peter > _______________________________________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well > terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
