Thanks, that is really helpful. It would be really nifty to add a “DMARC 1.0 compliance” percentage next to each sender. I’m seeing lots of reports that don’t follow the XML format defined in the RFC.
Thanks, Peter > On Feb 10, 2016, at 12:35 PM, Matt Vernhout <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is a fairly good list of potential DMARC senders: > https://dmarcian.com/dmarc-status/ <https://dmarcian.com/dmarc-status/> > > Cheers, > > ~ > MATT VERNHOUT > Founder, Editor > > EmailKarma.net <http://ekma.co/16G2Htm> > It's not the size of your list, it's how you use it! > > My profiles: <http://ekma.co/1GrpgS5> <http://ekma.co/1bSPqy0> > <http://ekma.co/16G2GFC> <http://ekma.co/16G2Htm> <http://ekma.co/1aqglmS> > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Peter Bowen via dmarc-discuss > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Does anyone maintain a list of receivers known to send DMARC reports? I > enabled DMARC reporting for a domain we use for sending and have gotten > reports so far from 126.com <http://126.com/>, AOL, Belgacom, CapitalOne, > Cisco, Comcast, FastMail, Google, Infor, Microsoft, mail.ru > <http://mail.ru/>, NetEase (163.com <http://163.com/>), QQ,and Yahoo. > > From these reports, I’ve seen a number of different variations that do not > follow the XML Schema in RFC 7489. I know there is the DMARC WG at IETF, but > I haven’t seen any updates on the core spec, so I’m hoping someone > implementing DMARC may have sorted out what is considered acceptable. > > Thanks, > Peter > _______________________________________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > <http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss> > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms > (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html <http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html>) >
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
