The DMARC on the mailing list passes when it reaches me -- it appears that
something in the path between you and dmarc.org is the problem with breaking
the DKIM signature.
Since it's dmarc.org's DKIM signature, it's put on after all the mailing list
handling, so I'm not sure why anybody thinks mailing list handling is involved?
Elizabeth
On Tuesday, October 4, 2016 8:03 AM, Benny Pedersen via dmarc-discuss
<dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote:
Authentication-Results: linode.junc.eu; dmarc=pass header.from=dmarc.org
Authentication-Results: linode.junc.eu;
dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=dmarc.org
header.i=@dmarc.org header.b=g7uNA2zS;
dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; secure)
header.d=junc.eu header.i=@junc.eu header.b=rpMrxjyH;
dkim-atps=neutral
thanks all, is dmarc really so hard to not break ?
when will dmarc.org have dnssec ?
wake up admins
would it be possible to skip last signer if multisigned ?, in the long
term i would not accept such mails anymore, and i am also unimpressed of
that dmarc can pass with no dnssec, badly designed
or is it possibel to blacklist signer in dkim/dmarc ?
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
