Petr, Do you also kick small dogs? I'd suggest that a 2-week turnaround on a bug that's non-critical for Fortinet's customers is pretty impressive.
On the meaning of "by design", there are of course multiple designs (intentions) present. Surely you're familiar with the tree-swing project management cartoon? You know this happens all the time in real engineering organisations, right? http://www.tamingdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/tree-swing-project-management-large.png - Roland From: dmarc-discuss <[email protected]> on behalf of Petr Novák via dmarc-discuss <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, 25 November 2016 17:57 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [dmarc-discuss] Getting to reject, was :Re: FortiNet’s FortiMail DMARC implementation Well if it wasn't by design then how do you explain this reply from your support team. quote: "I've got feedback from engineering on this. The current behavior is by design, the action for DMARC check failure is driven by the action next to the DMARC check (action-dmarc) no matter the DMARC policy (p=) setting." Which then continued with: "Thank you for the feedback. I agree that it would be nice to respect the "none" or give more control over what action should be done in which case. But as per update from engineering the current FortiMail behavior is by design and there is no current plan to change the behavior." Anyway I am glad that it will be fixed. Regards Petr Dne 25.11.2016 v 10:36 Carl Windsor via dmarc-discuss napsal(a): > Hi DMARC Group, I am the Product Manager @ Fortinet for FortiMail and can > confirm that this was not by design but a bug. As of 5.3 interim build 625 > we respect the p=none directive and this will be rolled in to the next patch > release (5.3.8). > > Carl Windsor _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
