I'd hazard a guess that confidentiality constraints get in the way here, for the same reason that most receivers won't provide DMARC failure reports, only aggregate reports.
Note that the feedback mechanism for receivers who wish to volunteer reports already exists - and is the origin of DMARC's ARF - that being to send to abuse contacts for the domain or the originating IP address. Those same confidentiality constraints mean that few receivers do so. A further concern for spam filters in particular is that a receiver has to be confident that the domain-owner is a legitimate sender; if not, the abuse reports are a tuning tool for a spammer. No receiver wants to help this happen. - Roland ________________________________ From: dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss-boun...@dmarc.org> on behalf of Jonathan Knopp via dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> Sent: Tuesday, 29 November 2016 12:22 To: dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org Subject: [dmarc-discuss] FBL via DMARC? Has there been any discussion about using DMARC to configure spam complaint feedback loops? Currently it is only feasible to register for the big ESPs and can be tough to keep them up to date. DMARC could make this automatic and universal. It would be well within DMARC's mandate of domain reputation protection since it would let you know quickly when someone has infiltrated your systems and is sending spam via your legitimate email path. _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
