Am 19.04.2018 um 12:32 schrieb Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss: > I had that. However, I missed the <version> element inside <feedback>. the <version> element will be present in tomorrow's reports.
> Although this is optional, I think that's the reason why I don't "see" your > reports. There is a SHOULD in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7489#section-7.2.1.1. I dislike that, but sending plain xml is valid. > In addition, they're not pretty printed. Yes, rspamd programmer don't waste time to make machine readable text pretty... > If I were you, I'd use BCC: to address dmarc-send. I do so, but obviously you (+Juri) saw more. Andreas _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
