On 19.04.2018 12:32, Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss wrote: > On Thu 19/Apr/2018 08:30:04 +0200 Juri Haberland via dmarc-discuss wrote:
>> This is what I found: >> - wrong MIME type: expected: text/xml (.xml); found: application/xml (.xml) > I found text/xml as required Right. >> - missing <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?> at the top > I had that. However, I missed the <version> element inside <feedback>. And again right. *Sigh*, should not have trusted my new Web frontend. That had a misleading message and made me think I see the pure attachment and not an interpretation of it. Sorry, Juri _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
