On Apr 14, 2014, at 10:43 AM, Kurt Roeckx <[email protected]> wrote: > What would also help is: > - Implementations that actually follow the spec. So far I have > received 0 report mails that follow the specification.
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mail-DMARC/ and the report format definition: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mail-DMARC/lib/Mail/DMARC/Report/Aggregate.pm If you received a report from me (or another site that uses Mail::DMARC), you'd get a report that follows the 2013 draft. To the letter. I haven't read the latest draft in enough detail to assure that is still the case. While writing Mail::DMARC, I noticed a number of anomalies in the reports I was receiving. Upon reporting on those issues to the dmarc-users mailing list, all of them (except a hotmail issue) got a "oops, we'll fix that," response. I haven't gone back to see if I can remove the "tolerate this malformation in a report" shims, but my assumption is that I can remove most of them. Matt _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
