On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:44 PM, Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote:
> The reason there is no IETF working group is that the people behind DMARC > were > unwilling to entertain participation in a working group that had a charter > that allowed for any chance of a change to the DMARC protocol. > I think that's a bit hyperbolic. There was perhaps too much emphasis on protecting the deployed base, but had they been confronted with actual data about something that wouldn't work (rather than the typical theory-only assertions on which working groups like to rathole), there would have been ample justification for a change. > DMARC change is even more off the table than MLM software change (which > does, > as you suggest, evolve over time). > Are there changes people want to make? So far all I've seen is "something needs to change", but nothing concrete, or at least nothing that has garnered consensus of some sort. > I wrote the other day asking what IETF work is there around DMARC and > didn't > get much of an answer. I think that's instructive. I think that conclusion is premature. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
