>Also, it's a dance to put more policy data into the DNS in any form. The >"DNS people", as we appear to like to call them, don't like use of DNS to >store policy data even though it's extremely convenient for us to do so. >At a minimum, if we try to do that with TXT records again, we can expect a >huge amount of friction. We need to be sure that battle is worth having, >and I'm not convinced that it is given the caveats above and in Stephen's >email.
I don't see that as a problem. We already have RFC 5518 vouch by reference which is very close if not identical to what you'd need here. >Finally, no DNS-based third party whitelisting scheme has ever gotten any >traction. That, on the other hand, is a problem. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
