On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 8:07 AM, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
> >Also, it's a dance to put more policy data into the DNS in any form. The > >"DNS people", as we appear to like to call them, don't like use of DNS to > >store policy data even though it's extremely convenient for us to do so. > >At a minimum, if we try to do that with TXT records again, we can expect a > >huge amount of friction. We need to be sure that battle is worth having, > >and I'm not convinced that it is given the caveats above and in Stephen's > >email. > > I don't see that as a problem. We already have RFC 5518 vouch by > reference which is very close if not identical to what you'd need > here. > I'm not talking about recycling existing stuff. I'm talking about new mechanisms that aren't out there already, not new data. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
