On 6/25/2014 11:14 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Dave Crocker writes: > > How about: > > > > 2. Intra-Specification -- Audit each part of the DMARC > > specification (reporting, policy, auth), making improvements to > > an incremental version as appropriate. > > > > Best to leave out statements of intended status and just focus on the work. > > OK. Kinda picky, but how about "revised specification" instead of > "incremental version"?
Well, the language I offered was also produced from pickiness. In reaction to a possible misunderstanding of the earlier draft charter text. The problem is that 'revised specification' might be taken to mean a 'replacement' for the existing version, as in not publishing the current version but instead publishing the revision. By contrast, incremental is meant to imply that both current and new get published... d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
