On 6/26/14 1:37 PM, John Levine wrote: >> I don't see how this can be considered out of scope without a viable >> alternative. The identification of the Administrative Domain is a >> normative requirement in DMARC, and if this problem is not solved, the >> specification will be stuck. Having tried and failed to solve this >> problem several years ago, I am convinced that this is a very difficult >> problem. > There's a proto-wg called dbound thinking about this topic. Marc > Blanchet and I are trying to write up a problem statement before the > Toronto cutoff, so we can at least try and see if there is any > agreement on what problem we're trying to solve.
That's good acknowledgment of the problem, and I agree with Dave Crocker's comment that this problem is bigger than this WG. > > In practice, until something better shows up everyone downloads and > uses Mozilla's PSL. It's a crock, but it's what people use. But I can't see IETF publishing a standards-track specification that uses the PSL, or anything like that. So given that the dbound effort is behind this one, I'm concerned that this WG would face a very long normative reference dependency wait before it could publish anything standards-track. -Jim _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
