On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 8:17 AM, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > >OK, seriously, I hope I don't have to crack this open again. Conflict > >review is slated for the 1/8 telechat, and a flurry of last minute edits > >might not sit well with the IESG. We need to leave actual work, as much > as > >at all possible, to the WG, and not to hacking on the ISE version. > > > >Diffs to -09 which will be in -10 within the next few days: > >http://blackops.org/~msk/dmarc/diff.html > > The current diff shows the entire file deleted and replaced with an > empty one. While I would enthusiastically endorse this change, I > suspect it's not the one you had in mind. >
I was going for brevity. Actually, xml2rfc was complaining that it's now 2015 and the XML source was trying to force a date in 2014. Fixed now. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
