What sorts of things do you want to see in an MUA? - Gmail says, of messages in the spam folder, “This message is here because others marked it as spam.” - If you enable it in Gmail, they also put a key beside authenticated messages - Outlook.com/Hotmail has a Green Shield in the List view next to messages that are on the Green Shield list (large brand susceptible to spoofing, manually maintained) and pass authentication - Outlook desktop says “This message was marked as spam by a filter other than the Outlook junk client” - Outlook desktop also disables Links, Reply, Reply All, and Attachments for messages in Junk, and any message marked as Phish regardless of whether or not it is in the inbox
Within Microsoft, we’re looking at how to include some of the things in outlook.com/Hotmail into Outlook and how best to integrate safety into the overall user experience in mail clients Microsoft controls. While traditionally there hasn’t been a lot of MTA-to-MUA communication (other than Exchange and Outlook), that doesn’t need to be the case going forward. -- Terry From: dmarc [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Murray S. Kucherawy Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 12:52 PM To: <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; Anne Bennett Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Third Party Sender DMARC Adaptations On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Rolf E. Sonneveld <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: if DMARC is really the succes that dmarc.org<http://dmarc.org> claims it is [1] and with so many of the big ESPs around here [2] I fail to see why it would be so difficult to involve the MUA developers of these same ESPs? Several of them are here. If they have better experience understanding what actually gets through to users in terms of message safety that doesn't reduce to, as John Levine put it, "Where do I click to make this warning go away?", they have yet to say so. :-) -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
