dmarc  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy Matthäus Wander
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy Mark Alley
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] no DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] no DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] of course no DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy John R. Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] of course no DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] no DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] no DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy John R. Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] no DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy John Levine
• [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-10.txt internet-drafts
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-10.txt Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-10.txt Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-10.txt John Levine
• [dmarc-ietf] General Purpose Domain Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] General Purpose Domain Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] General Purpose Domain Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] General Purpose Domain Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] General Purpose Domain Alessandro Vesely
• [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Section 11.5 Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Section 11.5 Todd Herr
• [dmarc-ietf] DMARC exceptions Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC exceptions Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC exceptions Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC exceptions Hector Santos
• [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs Mark Alley
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs OLIVIER HUREAU
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs Mark Alley
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs Mark Alley
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs Tim Wicinski
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs Mark Alley
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs Tero Kivinen
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs Tim Wicinski
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs John Levine
• [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It? Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It? Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It? Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It? Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It? Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It? Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It? Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It? John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It? John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It? Dotzero
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It? Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It? Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It? Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It? John R Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It? Dotzero
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It? Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It? John R Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It? Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It? Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It? Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It? Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It? Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It? Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It? John R Levine
• [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 134 - What To Do With Appendix A.5? Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 134 - What To Do With Appendix A.5? Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 134 - What To Do With Appendix A.5? John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 134 - What To Do With Appendix A.5? Murray S. Kucherawy
• [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice) Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice) Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice) Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice) Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice) Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice) Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice) Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice) John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice) Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice) Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice) Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice) Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice) Todd Herr
• [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment Tobias Herkula
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment Tobias Herkula
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment OLIVIER HUREAU
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment John R. Levine
• [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7489 (7835) Eliot Lear
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7489 (7835) Todd Herr
• [dmarc-ietf] Don't trivialize psd=n Douglas Foster
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Don't trivialize psd=n Neil Anuskiewicz
• [dmarc-ietf] Appendix B.2.3. Per-Message Failure Reports Directed to Third Party Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Appendix B.2.3. Per-Message Failure Reports Directed to Third Party Todd Herr
• [dmarc-ietf] Nit: Appendix B.1, examples parallelism and typo Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nit: Appendix B.1, examples parallelism and typo Todd Herr
• [dmarc-ietf] picking nits with the ABNF Tim Wicinski
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] picking nits with the ABNF OLIVIER HUREAU
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] picking nits with the ABNF Tim Wicinski
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] picking nits with the ABNF Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] picking nits with the ABNF Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] picking nits with the ABNF Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] picking nits with the ABNF Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] picking nits with the ABNF Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] picking nits with the ABNF Murray S. Kucherawy
• [dmarc-ietf] A.5 Issues with ADSP in Operation Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] A.5 Issues with ADSP in Operation Tim Wicinski
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] A.5 Issues with ADSP in Operation Benny Pedersen
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] A.5 Issues with ADSP in Operation Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] A.5 Issues with ADSP in Operation Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] A.5 Issues with ADSP in Operation Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] A.5 Issues with ADSP in Operation Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] A.5 Issues with ADSP in Operation Matt V
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] A.5 Issues with ADSP in Operation Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] A.5 Issues with ADSP in Operation Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] A.5 Issues with ADSP in Operation Hector Santos
• [dmarc-ietf] Nit: missing angle brackets Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nit: missing angle brackets Todd Herr
• [dmarc-ietf] Section 9.5 DMARC Report Format Registry Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Section 9.5 DMARC Report Format Registry Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Section 9.5 DMARC Report Format Registry Tim Wicinski
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Section 9.5 DMARC Report Format Registry Tim Wicinski
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Section 9.5 DMARC Report Format Registry Todd Herr
• [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Clarify When Tree Walk Starts? Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Clarify When Tree Walk Starts? Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Clarify When Tree Walk Starts? Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Clarify When Tree Walk Starts? Scott Kitterman
• [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7835) Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7835) Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7835) Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7835) Todd Herr
• [dmarc-ietf] 5.5. Domain Owner Actions Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5. Domain Owner Actions Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5. Domain Owner Actions Alessandro Vesely
• [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF advice Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF advice Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF advice Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF advice Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF advice Alessandro Vesely
  • [dmarc-ietf] SHOULD (was Re: Another point for SPF advice) Murray S. Kucherawy
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF advice Hector Santos
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another point for SPF advice Alessandro Vesely
• [dmarc-ietf] The description of psd=n Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] The description of psd=n Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] The description of psd=n Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] The description of psd=n Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] The description of psd=n Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] The description of psd=n Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] The description of psd=n Scott Kitterman
• [dmarc-ietf] A possible point for SPF advice Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] A possible point for SPF advice Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] A possible point for SPF advice Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] A possible point for SPF advice Richard Clayton
• [dmarc-ietf] 4.3. Authentication Mechanisms Alessandro Vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DISCARD: 4.3. Authentication Mechanisms Alessandro Vesely
• [dmarc-ietf] 4.1 DMARC Basics vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] 4.1 DMARC Basics Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] 4.1 DMARC Basics Neil Anuskiewicz
• [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Description of rua and ruf Tags Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Description of rua and ruf Tags John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Description of rua and ruf Tags Seth Blank
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Description of rua and ruf Tags John R Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Description of rua and ruf Tags Neil Anuskiewicz
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Description of rua and ruf Tags vesely
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Description of rua and ruf Tags Murray S. Kucherawy
• [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Section 11.3 Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Section 11.3 Barry Leiba
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Section 11.3 Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Section 11.3 John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Section 11.3 Todd Herr
• [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Seth Blank
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 John Levine
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Seth Blank
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Todd Herr
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Scott Kitterman
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Dotzero
  • Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Significant(ish) Issue - Section 7.6 Scott Kitterman

• Earlier messages
• Later messages