----- Original Message ----- > From: "Terry Zink" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 11:26:00 AM > Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Indirect Mail Flow Solution Utility Analysis > > > Who knows? Perhaps Yahoo and AOL would suffer "user diaspora" if they > > kept publishing p=reject and MLMs decided to be DMARC-compliant when > > reinjecting messages. > > I see a lot of "Yahoo and AOL did this", "Yahoo and AOL don't care", "Yahoo > and AOL pushed their problems onto everyone else", etc. I don't think it's > useful to blame Yahoo and AOL for everything. What happens when Hotmail.com, > outlook.com, and gmail.com start publishing p=reject? Are we going to say > "The big four email providers pushed their problems onto everyone else" ? > > Then, if other big email providers in non-American markets (mail.ru, > orange.fr, etc.) start doing it, are we going to say "Everyone but me pushes > their problems onto the smaller providers" ?
I think we should refrain to blame anything or anyone. It is what it is, and we should just note it, technically describe it, and see if better solutions can be provided. This atmosphere is not conducive for group work. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
