On May 9, 2015 5:00:24 AM EDT, "Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]> wrote: >Murray S. Kucherawy writes: > > > Agreed again. And as Terry has said and I think we can infer about > > other large operators, it's incorrect to assume (and plain wrong to > > assert) that this is an easy problem for them to solve in a > > reliable way. > >Please define "reliable." I gather you all think that missing some >mailing lists is a bigger problem than missing all of them, but for >the life of me, I cannot see why.
How many solutions do you think operators will be willing to implement? As I indicated in my utility assessment framework, I think we get a maximum of one solution that requires cooperative implementations in multiple parts of the originator/mediator/receiver trilogy. Given that, it had better be reasonably comprehensive. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
