Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC ATPS Interop Note

Fri, 22 May 2015 16:00:49 -0700 



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]>
> To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected], "Douglas Otis" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 12:51:44 AM
> Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC ATPS Interop Note
> 
> Murray S. Kucherawy writes:
> 
).
> 
> (3) I would really like to see some provision for reporting to mailbox
>     users when their mail is being discarded due to publication of
>     p=reject by their mailbox providers, especially in cases where a
>     Mediator is willing to put its reputation on the line by signing
>     the forwarded message.
> 
>     Note that this would only be a burden to abusers of p=reject, as
>     in the case of transactional mail the responsible author is the
>     corporate entity, not the employee.  So no further report would be
>     appropriate in that case, as the organization is already receiving
>     the DMARC reports.
> 

The email is bounced, not discarded. The mailbox user knows about it. 
Unfortunately, bounces are so ugly that few people can successfully read them.

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc





























					Reply via email to