On 10/3/2015 6:35 PM, John Levine wrote: > People have looked at the code in most existing DKIM verifiers to see > whether the code matches the spec, and the current code does indeed > reject signatures that don't start with v=1.
Yeah, and what's interesting about that is that the spec does not explicitly specify that signatures without a v=1 need to be failed. And you said 'most', not 'all'. Anyhow this wasn't the primary focus of my comments and you haven't responded to those. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
