On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yeah, and what's interesting about that is that the spec does not
> explicitly specify that signatures without a v=1 need to be failed.
>

I believe Section 6.1.1, first paragraph, has that covered.

-MSK
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to