Hi Kurt, > On 1 Apr 2016, at 19:13, Kurt Andersen (b) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Since we've completed the task of identifying the interoperability problems > with some mitigations (phase I), is it time for us to move on to our next > activity phase? > > Also, is there some admin-magic that has to happen to move a document from > "draft" to "hey! all done!" status? > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability/)
One of the chairs should do shepherding write up and request publication using datatracker. Or find another person who can serve as the document shepherd. > > From the group charter: >> Phase I: >> * Draft description of interoperability issues for indirect mail flows >> and plausible methods for reducing them. >> Phase II: >> * Specification of DMARC improvements to support indirect mail flows >> * Draft Guide on DMARC Usage >> Phase III: >> * Review and refinement of the DMARC specification >> * Completion of Guide on DMARC Usage > > I think that we need to update our target milestones a bit since they still > call for everything to be completed by May 2015. That would be great! Alexey, Who would become the responsible AD for this group on Wednesday evening.
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
