> Hi Kurt,
> > On 1 Apr 2016, at 19:13, Kurt Andersen (b) <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Since we've completed the task of identifying the interoperability problems
> > with some mitigations (phase I), is it time for us to move on to our next
> > activity phase?
> >
> > Also, is there some admin-magic that has to happen to move a document from
> > "draft" to "hey! all done!" status?
> > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability/)
> One of the chairs should do shepherding write up and request publication
> using datatracker. Or find another person who can serve as the document
> shepherd.
I'll take care of it.
> >
> > From the group charter:
> >> Phase I:
> >> * Draft description of interoperability issues for indirect mail flows
> >> and plausible methods for reducing them.
> >> Phase II:
> >> * Specification of DMARC improvements to support indirect mail flows
> >> * Draft Guide on DMARC Usage
> >> Phase III:
> >> * Review and refinement of the DMARC specification
> >> * Completion of Guide on DMARC Usage
> >
> > I think that we need to update our target milestones a bit since they still
> > call for everything to be completed by May 2015.
> That would be great!
> Alexey,
> Who would become the responsible AD for this group on Wednesday evening.
I won't be there but may be online.
Ned
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
