Extricating this discussion from the one about key sizes.  We left off
at discussing whether we should implement something like a cv=invalid
for arc chains that are no longer well defined.

Brandon, I think you had the last response, and suggested that
receivers just refuse to continue to process invalid chains?  This
seems plausible, and might be simpler.  I have no strong opinions one
way or the other, although I think I slightly prefer the cv=invalid
state, as it strictly defines what receivers are to do with invalid
chains.

Regardless, I still stand by the fact that section 5.2.1 needs to go &
that we should probably explicitly codify what constitutes an invalid
arc chain.

Regards,
=Gene

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to