I strongly agree about the "not for reporting" part, but what probably would be good is to get such reports now, so that one might tell whether there's a previously-unnoticed issue with ARC as there turned out to be with DMARC. If there were such an issue, a meeting would be a good idea.
Best regards, Andrew (mostly watching from the cheap seats) -- Andrew Sullivan Please excuse my clumbsy thums. > On May 30, 2017, at 11:03, Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> didn't follow all ARC discussion over the last months. An update >> is welcome. Also it would be helpful if Murray could give an update on his >> openarc project. > > > However IETF face-to-face meetings are not for reporting. They are for > working to resolve outstanding issues. > > Reporting can be done on the mailing list, more easily, more completely, and > far less expensively. > > d/ > > -- > Dave Crocker > Brandenburg InternetWorking > bbiw.net > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
