(Reposting with adjusted subject) On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Kurt Andersen (b) <[email protected]> wrote:
> Barry et al, > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 1:14 AM, Seth Blank <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The current spec defines an arc authres method ( >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-03#section-8.1 >> ). >> >> We believe there should also be registered ptypes and properties, that >> should be stamped (but are not required, as they won't always be available). >> >> As long as AR stamping happens at the end of chain validation, when an >> ARC set gets created this stamp will be included in the AAR, and AAR >> construction can be clean with no additional language or requirements >> necessary in the spec. >> > > This area seems like something that would be productively explored in a > F2F since it is pretty undefined right now and there are some divergent > opinions kicking around... (see the thread with Brandon and Scott so far) > > --Kurt >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
