AR might be 10-15 minutes.

What to do to transport the source_ip, which is valuable to report
consumers but doesn't appear to belong in the AR/AAR, could be a
contentious and therefore longer discussion.

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 5:42 AM, Barry Leiba <[email protected]>
wrote:

> How long do we think we need for this discussion?
>
> b
>
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Kurt Andersen (b) <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > (Reposting with adjusted subject)
> >
> > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Kurt Andersen (b) <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Barry et al,
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 1:14 AM, Seth Blank <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The current spec defines an arc authres method
> >>> (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-
> 03#section-8.1).
> >>>
> >>> We believe there should also be registered ptypes and properties, that
> >>> should be stamped (but are not required, as they won't always be
> available).
> >>>
> >>> As long as AR stamping happens at the end of chain validation, when an
> >>> ARC set gets created this stamp will be included in the AAR, and AAR
> >>> construction can be clean with no additional language or requirements
> >>> necessary in the spec.
> >>
> >>
> >> This area seems like something that would be productively explored in a
> >> F2F since it is pretty undefined right now and there are some divergent
> >> opinions kicking around... (see the thread with Brandon and Scott so
> far)
> >>
> >> --Kurt
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dmarc mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>



-- 

[image: logo for sig file.png]

Bringing Trust to Email

Seth Blank | Head of Product for Open Source and Protocols
[email protected]
+1-415-894-2724 <415-894-2724>
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to