On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, at 07:52, Seth Blank wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Bron Gondwana > <[email protected]> wrote:> > That seems like it would be enough to fix > that objection. An > > additional "first AMS failure" header at each hop would give you a > > list of who actually modified the message.> > arc.closest_fail has been defined to accomplish this.
That looks great. It adds enough information that my other questions are basically efficiency concerns, which are not nothing, but at least ARC signing doesn't make things worse (except in the DNS tempfail case that Brandon addressed in the other email today) Bron. -- Bron Gondwana, CEO, FastMail Pty Ltd [email protected]
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
