On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 5:34 AM, Seth Blank <[email protected]> wrote:
> Since we're aiming for an Experimental document, it was discussed that it > makes sense to define that experiment. I'm proposing the following section, > and suggest it be the final section after Security Considerations but > before References. > > For this section, I'm taking the stance "the best way to get the right > answer online is to give the wrong answer online." The one thing I know is > that what I've proposed below is wrong. It's just a matter of how, why, and > to what degree. > While I have a number of issues with the details of the proposal, I'll tackle those in another thread. The fundamental problem that I have with the whole "experiment" approach is that it is something like throwing a baseball into a pool of quiescent sharks. I have no confidence that "hoping" for people to do something that a random group of people propose in an RFC will bear any fruit at all. It's not an experiment, it's an exercise in futility. --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
