On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Seth Blank <[email protected]> wrote:
> That is also what I remember, and why I proposed the Experimental > Considerstions as part of the primary draft and not the usage guide. > > Kurt had some strong opinions on why they belonged in the usage guide, > which I suggest we revisit in another thread. > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 15:11 Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I recall an extended discussion that produced agreement on experiment. >> >> I don't recall seeing a discussion to reverse that, nor a change in >> circumstances that makes obvious the need for the change. >> > This was also my understanding. "Experimental" is perfectly fine. As I understand it, EAI did that first and went to the standards track after it had some field use. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
