On 12/22/2017 10:03 AM, John R Levine wrote:
We'll have to agree to disagree about whether it's a good idea to invent a new name for every version tweak that's not fully backward compatible, particularly ones that don't change the parsing, just the interpretation.
1. I believe such incompatibilities are relatively rare. 2. It should be viewed as a Very Big Deal. Compatibility is essential for operational stability, so something that breaks that is inherently traumatic. Using a new, lower-level identifier is the least of the issues. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
