On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 7:57 PM, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
> I understand the motivation, but I think that if we do that, it makes > it a lot less likely that people will actually implement the > rotation stuff. > Since there are only a handful of major implementations right now, all of whom are participating in this group, I don't think there's a big risk of this getting lost - unless we don't figure it out for many many months and major implementors disengage. And as a maintainer and patron of several of these implementations, this will be a priority as soon as it's baked, be that in this doc or a separate one. My strong bias (on my sleeve!) is to get the experiment rolling, and sort other components that don't affect the experiment in separate documents. The two that are top of mind are algorithm rotation and DMARC reporting, but could also include A-R stamping if 7601bis needs more time. Seth
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
