On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 6:36 PM, John R Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
> I still don't understand why we need to say more than DKIM did on this >> topic. > > > I don't think this will be super complicated, but I do think it would be a > mistake to try and publish now and then retrofit rather than adding it > before we publish. > I agree (which is why I started off with the first draft that is currently found in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-10#section-10). The mechanics of one doc, two docs, three docs more (can you tell that I've been cleaning out Dr. Seuss from my bookshelves over the break?) is less important to me than having a workable strategy. Migrations are always the hardest part of an implementation. --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
